↓ Skip to main content

A multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Radiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy
Published in
British Journal of Radiology, November 2015
DOI 10.1259/bjr.20150603
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine if subsets of patients may benefit from smaller or larger margins when using laser set-up and bony anatomy verification of breast tumour bed boost radiotherapy (RT). Verification imaging data acquired using cone-beam CT, mega-voltage CT or 2D kilovoltage imaging on 218 patients were used (1574 images). Tumour bed (TB) set-up errors for laser only set-up (dlaser) and for bony anatomy verification (dbone) were determined using clips implanted into the TB as a gold standard for the TB position. Cases were grouped by centre, by patient and by treatment related factors, including breast volume, TB position, seroma visibility and surgical technique. Systematic (Σ) and random (σ) TB set-up errors were compared between groups, and tumour bed planning target volume margins (MTB) were calculated. For the study population, Σlaser was between 2.8 and 3.4 mm and Σbone was between 2.2 and 2.6 mm, respectively. Women with larger breasts (p=0.03), easily-visible seroma (p≤0.02) and open surgical technique (p≤0.04) had larger Σlaser. Σbone was larger for women with larger breasts (p=0.015), and lateral tumours (p=0.04). Women with medial tumours (p=0.002) had smaller Σbone. If clips are not used, margins should be 8mm and 10 mm for bony anatomy verification and laser set up, respectively. Individualisation of TB margins may be considered based on breast volume, tumour bed position and seroma visibility. Advances in knowledge: Set-up accuracy using lasers and bony anatomy is influenced by patient and treatment factors. Some patients may benefit from clip-based image guidance more than others.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 35%
Physics and Astronomy 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#28,605,296
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Radiology
#3,780
of 4,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,762
of 440,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Radiology
#33
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.