↓ Skip to main content

Recent progress in biosensors based on organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers

Overview of attention for article published in Biosensors & Bioelectronics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recent progress in biosensors based on organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers
Published in
Biosensors & Bioelectronics, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.bios.2018.08.058
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers (HNFs) are a class of flower-like hybrid materials self-assembled from metal ions and organic components, such as enzymes, antibodies, DNA and amino acids et al. Based on their properties of enhanced enzyme activity, stability, facile synthesis and excellent biocompatibility, HNFs enable them to be a highly versatile platform for latent applications in many realms, such as biological sensing, biomimetic catalyst, dye decolorization and support nanomaterials, etc. Compared with free enzymes, HNFs are potentially advantageous for biological applications owing to their enhanced catalytic ability and powerful load capacity. Herein, an overview of recent developments achieved in HNFs biosensing, including electrochemical biosensors, colorimetric biosensors, and point-of-care diagnostic devices, is provided. We summarized the preparation of different HNFs based on the type of metal ions and biomolecules used. The signal tags involved in the all-in-one hybrid nanoflowers are particularly emphasized. The challenges, future trends, and prospects associated with HNFs and their related materials for biosensing are also discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 39 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 16%
Chemical Engineering 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Materials Science 6 6%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 40 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,540,110
of 34,539,236 outputs
Outputs from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#1,671
of 9,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,101
of 374,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#29
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,539,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.