↓ Skip to main content

piRNAs and PIWI proteins: regulators of gene expression in development and stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Development (09501991), September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
piRNAs and PIWI proteins: regulators of gene expression in development and stem cells
Published in
Development (09501991), September 2018
DOI 10.1242/dev.161786
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

PIWI proteins and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) have established and conserved roles in repressing transposable elements (TEs) in the germline of animals. However, in several biological contexts, a large proportion of piRNAs are not related to TE sequences and, accordingly, functions for piRNAs and PIWI proteins that are independent of TE regulation have been identified. This aspect of piRNA biology is expanding rapidly. Indeed, recent reports have revealed the role of piRNAs in the regulation of endogenous gene expression programs in germ cells, as well as in somatic tissues, challenging dogma in the piRNA field. In this Review, we focus on recent data addressing the biological and developmental functions of piRNAs, highlighting their roles in embryonic patterning, germ cell specification, stem cell biology, neuronal activity and metabolism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 68 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 17%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 68 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#21,427,613
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Development (09501991)
#8,709
of 11,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,754
of 376,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development (09501991)
#53
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.