↓ Skip to main content

The Methodological Dynamism of Grounded Theory

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Qualitative Methods, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
422 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Methodological Dynamism of Grounded Theory
Published in
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, November 2015
DOI 10.1177/1609406915611576
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 415 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 60 14%
Student > Master 51 12%
Researcher 31 7%
Lecturer 17 4%
Other 71 17%
Unknown 83 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 99 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 69 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 8%
Psychology 27 6%
Arts and Humanities 25 6%
Other 79 19%
Unknown 88 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,236,012
of 33,503,639 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#378
of 1,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,071
of 437,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,503,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.