↓ Skip to main content

Observation of current rectification by the new bimetallic iron( iii ) hydrophobe [Fe III2 (L N4O6 )] on Au|LB-molecule|Au devices

Overview of attention for article published in Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Observation of current rectification by the new bimetallic iron( iii ) hydrophobe [Fe III2 (L N4O6 )] on Au|LB-molecule|Au devices
Published in
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c8dt03158d
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Targeting the development of stimulus-responsive molecular materials with electronic functionality, we have synthesized and studied the redox and electronic properties of a new bimetallic iron hydrophobe [FeIII2(LN4O6)] (1). The new H6LN4O6 ligand displays bicompartmental topology capable of accomodating two five-coordinate HSFeIII ions bridged by tetraaminobenzene at a close distance of ca. 8 Å. We show that the metal-based reduction processes in (1) proceed sequentially, as observed for electronically coupled metal centers. This species forms a well-defined Pockels-Langmuir film at the air-water interface, with collapse pressure of 32 mN m-1. Langmuir-Blodgett monolayers were deposited on gold substrates and used to investigate current-voltage (I-V) measurements. This unprecedented bimetallic hydrophobe [FeIII2(LN4O6)] (1) shows unquestionable molecular rectification and displays a rectification ratio RR between 2 and 15.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#23,325,568
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#10,460
of 24,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,719
of 496,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#565
of 1,607 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,607 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.