↓ Skip to main content

Hedonic Vices: Fixing Inferences about Willingness to Pay in Recent House-Value Studies 1

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hedonic Vices: Fixing Inferences about Willingness to Pay in Recent House-Value Studies 1
Published in
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, November 2015
DOI 10.1017/bca.2015.49
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 22%
Social Sciences 5 19%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,375,448
of 29,301,366 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
#187
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,682
of 405,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,301,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.