↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Effect of Preoperative Direct Ligation of Ethmoidal Arteries on the Perioperative Outcomes of Large Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas Surgery: A Clinical Study
Published in
World Neurosurgery, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.166
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Anterior skull base meningiomas often grow to a large size (≥4cm) prior to detection. Their blood supply is mostly provided by the anterior and posterior ethmoidal arteries. Because of their vascularity, intraoperative bleeding can be a challenging prospect that increases the risk of perioperative complications. Pre-operative ethmoidal arteries ligation has been employed to aid in limiting blood loss. The objective is to assess the effect of pre-operative arterial ligation on the perioperative course of large ((≥4cm) to giant (≥6cm) anterior skull base meningiomas. We retrospectively searched our database for large anterior skull base meningiomas (≥4cm). We analyzed differences in intraoperative blood loss, operative time, intraoperative transfusion, and hematological parameters between patients who did not undergo pre-operative ethmoidal arteries ligation (Group 1) and those who did (Group 2). Average estimated blood loss (EBL) was 825 mL (Group 1) vs. 350 mL (Group 2) (p = 0.42), drop in hemoglobin (Hg) was 4g/dl vs. 3.2g/dl (p = 0.53), drop in hematocrit (HCT) was 12.4% vs. 9.6% (p=0.64) and average operative time was 656 min vs. 598 min (p=0.58). EBL per volume yielded a ratio of 10.6 mL/cm3 vs. 4.1 mL/cm3 (p=0.06). Ethmoidal arteries ligation may have a benefit in large to giant anterior skull base meningiomas surgery. Our results showed a decrease in EBL and less drop in pre- and post-operative haemoglobin and hematocrit levels as compared to cases where no vascular ligation was performed when corrected for tumor volume.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Neuroscience 4 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from World Neurosurgery
#5,801
of 7,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,591
of 345,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Neurosurgery
#207
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,047 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.