↓ Skip to main content

Soybean phytate content: effect on calcium absorption

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, March 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Soybean phytate content: effect on calcium absorption
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, March 1991
DOI 10.1093/ajcn/53.3.745
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Absorption of calcium from soybeans with low and high phytate contents, intrinsically labeled with 45Ca, was measured in 16 normal women and compared in 15 of these same subjects with absorption of calcium from labeled milk. The average test load of calcium for all three sources was 2.45 mmol. Fractional calcium absorption (+/- SD) from the high-phytate soybeans averaged 0.310 +/- 0.070; from the low phytate soybeans, 0.414 +/- 0.074; and from milk, 0.377 +/- 0.056. The mean difference (+/- SEM) in fractional calcium absorption for the two phytate levels was 0.104 +/- 0.014 (P less than 0.001).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 20 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,768,708
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3,100
of 15,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355
of 24,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#9
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.