↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Retrievable Stents on Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Retrievable Stents on Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, May 2011
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a2494
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Brekenfeld, G. Schroth, P. Mordasini, U. Fischer, M.-L. Mono, A. Weck, M. Arnold, M. El-Koussy, J. Gralla

Abstract

Retrievable stents combine the high recanalization rate of stents and the capability of removing the thrombus offered by mechanical thrombectomy devices. We hypothesized that retrievable stents shorten time to recanalization in the multimodal approach for endovascular stroke treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 12%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 59%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,659,858
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#2,152
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,172
of 111,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.