↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Development of Glaucomatous Visual Field Conversion Using Baseline Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Ophthalmology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predicting Development of Glaucomatous Visual Field Conversion Using Baseline Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Published in
American Journal of Ophthalmology, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.11.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinbo Zhang, Nils Loewen, Ou Tan, David S. Greenfield, Joel S. Schuman, Rohit Varma, David Huang, Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study Group, David Huang, Brian Francis, David S. Greenfield, Richard K. Parrish, Joel S. Schuman, Rohit Varma, Krishna S. Kishor, Carolyn D. Quinn, Shawn Iverson, Nayara Kish, Jose Rebimbas, Debra Weiss, Vikas Chopra, John Gil-Flamer, Judith Linton, Sylvia Ramos, Eiyass Albeiruti, Nils Loewen, Robert Noecker, Michael DeRosa, Greg Owens, Melessa Salay, Kristy Truman, Janice Ladwig, Michelle Montalto, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Larry Kagemann, Mitra Sehi, Ou Tan, Yimin Wang, Gadi Wollstein, Sharon Bi, Swati Chakraborty, Robert DiLaura, Bo Hu, John Sell, Eleonore Savatovsky, Srinivas R. Sadda, Ranjith Konduru, Elnaz Rakhshan, Sowmya Srinivas, Ake T.H. Lu, Xinbo Zhang

Abstract

To predict the development of glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) measurements at baseline visit. Multi-center longitudinal observational study. Glaucoma suspects and pre-perimetric glaucoma participants in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study. The optic disc, the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (NFL), and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) were imaged with FD-OCT VF was assessed every 6 months. Conversion to perimetric glaucoma was defined by VF pattern standard deviation (PSD) or glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) outside normal limits on 3 consecutive tests. Hazard ratios were calculated with the Cox proportional hazard model. Predictive accuracy was measured by the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Of 513 eyes (309 participants), 55 eyes (46 participants) experienced VF conversion during 41 ± 23 months of follow-up. Significant (p<0.05, Cox regression) FD-OCT risk factors included all GCC, NFL, and disc variables, except for horizontal cup-to-disc ratio. GCC focal loss volume (FLV) was the best single predictor of conversion (AUC=0.753, p<0.001 for test against AUC = 0.5). Those with borderline or abnormal GCC-FLV had a 4-fold increase in conversion risk after 6 years (Kaplan-Meier). Optimal prediction of conversion was obtained using the glaucoma composite conversion index (GCCI) based on a multivariate Cox regression model that included GCC-FLV, inferior NFL quadrant thickness, age, and VF PSD. GCCI significantly improved predictive accuracy (AUC=0.783) over any single variable (p=0.04). Reductions in NFL and GCC thickness can predict the development of glaucomatous VF loss in glaucoma suspects and pre-perimetric glaucoma patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 28 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 45%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,255,901
of 33,503,639 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#738
of 8,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,703
of 438,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#9
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,503,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.