↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Many Opportunities to Record, Diagnose, or Treat Injection Drug–related Infections Are Missed: A Population-based Cohort Study of Inpatient and Emergency Department Settings
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, September 2018
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciy632
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Injection drug use (IDU) and IDU-related infections have increased dramatically. However, the incidence of IDU-related infections may be underreported because drug use is not recorded in diagnostic records where associated infections are identified. Our goal was to estimate a more accurate incidence of IDU-related infections by including IDU-related infections not recorded at the time infections are diagnosed. We performed a retrospective cohort study using inpatient and emergency department visits from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project for California, Florida, and New York. We identified all patients diagnosed with bacteremia or sepsis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis or septic arthritis, and skin or soft tissue infection. We estimated the incidence of IDU-related infections by identifying cases where drug use was recorded at the time of an infection and cases where drug use was not recorded at the time of infection but within 6 months before or after the infection diagnosis. We also analyzed factors associated with unrecorded IDU. There has been an increasing trend in the number of IDU-related infections. The annual number of IDU-related infections increased between 105% and 218% after incorporating infections in which drug use was unrecorded. Factors associated with drug use being unrecorded included emergency department diagnosis, the level of hospital experience treating drug use, age <18 years, and having Medicare as the primary payer. More than half of all IDU-related infections may be unrecorded in existing surveillance estimates. There may be many missed opportunities to record, diagnose, or treat underlying drug abuse among patients presenting with IDU-related infections.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 21 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,749,845
of 33,704,742 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#8,815
of 20,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,090
of 375,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#117
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,704,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.