↓ Skip to main content

Release of bio‐active dentine extracellular matrix components by histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi)

Overview of attention for article published in International Endodontic Journal, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Release of bio‐active dentine extracellular matrix components by histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi)
Published in
International Endodontic Journal, January 2016
DOI 10.1111/iej.12588
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To characterise dentine matrix component (DMC) release and smear layer removal by histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis). DMCs were extracted from powdered human dentine over 14d using three HDACis, valproic acid (VPA), trichostatin A (TSA) and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) and compared with a control extractant, 10% (w/v) EDTA. Protein compositions of the resultant extracts were analysed by 1D-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (1D-PAGE), TGF-β-1 and MMP-9 ELISAs and a high-throughput growth factor antibody array. Dentine discs with a standardised smear layer were prepared from human molars and treated with EDTA (17% w/v), polyacrylic acid (PA) (20% v/v) and the experimental HDACis prior to analysis by scanning electron microscopy. Parametric ELISA data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test, while non-parametric smear layer data was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.05). HDACis did not remove smear layer in the presence or absence of PA pre-treatment (p≥0.478). 1D-PAGE analysis demonstrated different protein profiles for EDTA and HDACi extracts. All HDACi-solutions released TGF-β-1 although less effectively than EDTA (p<0.001), while MMP-9 was extracted in significantly higher concentration by EDTA and VPA compared with TSA (P<0.012). Antibody-array analysis demonstrated the ability of HDACis to extract a complex cocktail of established/novel growth factors from dentine, albeit significantly less efficiently than EDTA for certain cytokines (TGF-β-1, PDGF-AA, VEGF-A) and significantly more effectively for others (GDF-15, IGF-1, EGRF-1, NGFR, BDNF, SCF-R). HDACi release a range of bioactive DMCs that could promote dentine repair processes in vivo; however, they are ineffective at removing smear layer. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 32 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Unknown 35 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2015.
All research outputs
#23,504,487
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from International Endodontic Journal
#897
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346,009
of 403,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Endodontic Journal
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.