↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Post‐transplant persistent lymphopenia is a strong predictor of late survival in isolated intestine and multivisceral transplantation
Published in
Transplant International, July 2015
DOI 10.1111/tri.12620
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) has been identified as a prognostic factor in liver transplantation. We hypothesized that a lower ALC may be linked to poor outcomes in isolated intestinal/multivisceral transplantation (IIT/MVT). The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of ALC in IIT/MVT. A total 141 IIT/MVT patients were eligible for the study. Posttransplant ALCs (at 3, 6, and 12 months) were evaluated, and prognostic impact of trend of ALC during the first year was investigated. Of these 141 patients, 108 patients survived in the first year (one-year survivors). One-year survivors were categorized according to posttransplant ALC at each time point. When ALC was decreased throughout the first year (posttransplant persistent lymphopenia: <500/μL at 3, 6, and 12 months), patient survival (P<0.001, hazard ratio=5.09) and graft survival (P<0.001, hazard ratio=5.15) after the first year was significantly worse, and this remained to be an independent risk factor. Negative impact of persistent lymphopenia on patient and graft survival was significant regardless of type of intestinal graft. Infection leading to mortality occurred more frequently in the persistent lymphopenia group (43% vs. 24%). Trend of posttransplant ALC may be a strong predictive marker for long-term outcome in one-year survivors after IIT/MVT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#11,163,436
of 33,127,577 outputs
Outputs from Transplant International
#1,034
of 2,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,358
of 295,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplant International
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,127,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.