↓ Skip to main content

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: the effect of intracluster light on photometric redshifts for weak gravitational lensing

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: the effect of intracluster light on photometric redshifts for weak gravitational lensing
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, July 2019
DOI 10.1093/mnras/stz2036
Authors

D Gruen, Y Zhang, A Palmese, B Yanny, V Busti, B Hoyle, P Melchior, C J Miller, E Rozo, E S Rykoff, T N Varga, F B Abdalla, S Allam, J Annis, S Avila, D Brooks, D L Burke, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, J Carretero, R Cawthon, M Crocce, C E Cunha, L N da Costa, C Davis, J De Vicente, S Desai, H T Diehl, J P Dietrich, A Drlica-Wagner, B Flaugher, P Fosalba, J Frieman, J García-Bellido, E Gaztanaga, D W Gerdes, R A Gruendl, J Gschwend, D L Hollowood, K Honscheid, D J James, T Jeltema, E Krause, R Kron, K Kuehn, N Kuropatkin, O Lahav, M Lima, H Lin, M A G Maia, J L Marshall, F Menanteau, R Miquel, R L C Ogando, A A Plazas, A K Romer, V Scarpine, I Sevilla-Noarbe, M Smith, M Soares-Santos, F Sobreira, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle, D Thomas, V Vikram, A R Walker,

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 65%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,227,331
of 28,818,276 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#7,474
of 41,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,139
of 365,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#191
of 821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,818,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.