↓ Skip to main content

Peri‐operative renal dysfunction: prevention and management

Overview of attention for article published in Anaesthesia, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Peri‐operative renal dysfunction: prevention and management
Published in
Anaesthesia, December 2015
DOI 10.1111/anae.13313
Pubmed ID
Authors

D Golden, J Corbett, L G Forni

Abstract

Postoperative increases in serum creatinine concentration, by amounts historically viewed as trivial, are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Acute kidney injury is common, affecting one in five patients admitted with acute medical disease and up to four in five patients admitted to intensive care, of whom one in two have had operations. This review is focused principally on the identification of patients at risk of acute kidney injury and the prevention of injury. In the main, there are no interventions that directly treat the damaged kidney. The management of acute kidney injury is based on correction of dehydration, hypotension, and urinary tract obstruction, stopping nephrotoxic drugs, giving antibiotics for bacterial infection, and commencing renal replacement therapy if necessary.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Colombia 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 89 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 14%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 27 27%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,480,572
of 34,243,538 outputs
Outputs from Anaesthesia
#2,175
of 6,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,620
of 444,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anaesthesia
#27
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,243,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.