↓ Skip to main content

Taming the Cationic Beast: Novel Developments in the Synthesis and Application of Weakly Coordinating Anions

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Taming the Cationic Beast: Novel Developments in the Synthesis and Application of Weakly Coordinating Anions
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/anie.201710782
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This Review gives a comprehensive overview of the most topical weakly coordinating anions (WCAs) and contains information on WCA design, stability, and applications. As an update to the 2004 review, developments in common classes of WCA are included. Methods for the incorporation of WCAs into a given system are discussed and advice given on how to best choose a method for the introduction of a particular WCA. A series of starting materials for a large number of WCA precursors and references are tabulated as a useful resource when looking for procedures to prepare WCAs. Furthermore, a collection of scales that allow the performance of a WCA, or its underlying Lewis acid, to be judged is collated with some advice on how to use them. The examples chosen to illustrate WCA developments are taken from a broad selection of topics where WCAs play a role. In addition a section focusing on transition metal and catalysis applications as well as supporting electrolytes is also included.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 240 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 27%
Student > Master 29 12%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 150 63%
Chemical Engineering 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Materials Science 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 66 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2026.
All research outputs
#3,591,942
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#8,775
of 61,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,169
of 378,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#154
of 730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.