↓ Skip to main content

Can housing improvements cure or prevent the onset of health conditions over time in deprived areas?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can housing improvements cure or prevent the onset of health conditions over time in deprived areas?
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2524-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is a need for more evidence linking particular housing improvements to changes in specific health conditions. Research often looks at generic works over short periods. We use a longitudinal sample (n = 1933) with a survey interval of 2-5 years. Multivariate logistic regression is used to calculate the odds ratios of developing or recovering from six health conditions according to receipt of four types of housing improvements. Receipt of fabric works was associated with higher likelihood of recovery from mental health problems and circulatory conditions. Receipt of central heating was also associated with higher likelihood of recovery form circulatory conditions. No evidence was found for the preventative effects of housing improvements. Health gain from housing improvements appears most likely when targeted at those in greatest health need. The health impacts of area-wide, non-targeted housing improvements are less clear in our study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Engineering 4 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,487,014
of 34,281,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,980
of 21,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,899
of 444,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#82
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,281,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.