↓ Skip to main content

CHARMM-GUI Input Generator for NAMD, GROMACS, AMBER, OpenMM, and CHARMM/OpenMM Simulations Using the CHARMM36 Additive Force Field

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 8,639)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 X users
patent
10 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
2319 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CHARMM-GUI Input Generator for NAMD, GROMACS, AMBER, OpenMM, and CHARMM/OpenMM Simulations Using the CHARMM36 Additive Force Field
Published in
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, November 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 2299 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 403 17%
Researcher 300 13%
Student > Bachelor 218 9%
Student > Master 196 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 95 4%
Other 276 12%
Unknown 831 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 424 18%
Chemistry 408 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 79 3%
Physics and Astronomy 66 3%
Other 253 11%
Unknown 924 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2026.
All research outputs
#1,317,313
of 34,267,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
#46
of 8,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,773
of 320,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
#1
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,267,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.