↓ Skip to main content

How Effective Are Incident‐Reporting Systems for Improving Patient Safety? A Systematic Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Milbank Quarterly, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
427 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How Effective Are Incident‐Reporting Systems for Improving Patient Safety? A Systematic Literature Review
Published in
Milbank Quarterly, December 2015
DOI 10.1111/1468-0009.12166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Unknown 418 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 6%
Researcher 26 6%
Student > Bachelor 24 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 78 18%
Unknown 180 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 15%
Social Sciences 20 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 19 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 3%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 187 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,607,806
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from Milbank Quarterly
#257
of 1,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,784
of 443,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Milbank Quarterly
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.