↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the amphibian exposome in an agricultural landscape using telemetry and passive sampling

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the amphibian exposome in an agricultural landscape using telemetry and passive sampling
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-28132-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Swanson, Erin Muths, Clay L. Pierce, Stephen J. Dinsmore, Mark W. Vandever, Michelle L. Hladik, Kelly L. Smalling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 26%
Environmental Science 17 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 27 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,832,866
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#39,850
of 124,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,868
of 327,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,210
of 3,522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.