↓ Skip to main content

Binding capacity of molecularly imprinted polymers and their nonimprinted analogs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography), November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Binding capacity of molecularly imprinted polymers and their nonimprinted analogs
Published in
Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography), November 2015
DOI 10.1002/jssc.201500874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zsanett Dorkó, Anett Szakolczai, Tatjana Verbić, George Horvai

Abstract

Molecularly imprinted polymers bind their target compounds at binding sites. The binding sites are typically based on some type of functional group, like a carboxylic group. The total amount of such functional groups and their distribution into available and unavailable groups is not well known. The total binding capacity is usually indirectly determined from adsorption isotherms, which are measured much below the theoretical binding capacity. This work shows that in a variety of differently prepared, methacrylic acid based molecularly imprinted and non-imprinted polymers, all carboxylic groups used for the polymer synthesis are retained in the polymer, 80-90% of them can be accessed by strong bases and essentially the same amount can be used for adsorption of weak bases. This high level of adsorption can only be achieved, however, if the adsorbed weak base is strong enough, if the polymer is sufficiently elastic and if the solvent does not compete too strongly for the binding sites. These results may explain why the maximum binding capacities obtained from isotherm measurements are usually not equal to the total amount of available binding sites. This study confirms the usefulness of non-imprinted polymers at high loadings. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 28%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 48%
Chemical Engineering 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography)
#2,134
of 3,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,597
of 292,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography)
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.