↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin C intake from diary recordings and risk of breast cancer in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Vitamin C intake from diary recordings and risk of breast cancer in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2011
DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2011.197
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Vitamin C intake has been inversely associated with breast cancer risk in case-control studies, but not in meta-analyses of cohort studies using Food Frequency Questionnaires, which can over-report fruit and vegetable intake, the main source of vitamin C. This is the first study to investigate associations between vitamin C intake and breast cancer risk using food diaries.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Other 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Mathematics 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2012.
All research outputs
#17,652,807
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3,288
of 3,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,312
of 239,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.