↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Progress on the Institute of Medicine Report The Future of Nursing

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Assessing Progress on the Institute of Medicine Report The Future of Nursing'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing Progress on the Institute of Medicine Report The Future of Nursing
Published by
The National Academies Press, December 2015
DOI 10.17226/21838
ISBNs
978-0-309-38031-7, 978-0-309-38032-4, 978-0-309-38033-1, 978-0-309-38035-5, 978-0-309-38034-8
Authors

Stuart H. Altman, Adrienne Stith Butler, and Lauren Shern, Editors; Committee for Assessing Progress on Implementing the Recommendations of the Institute of Medicine Report The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, , National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Editors

Stuart H. Altman, Adrienne Stith Butler, Lauren Shern

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 290 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 45 15%
Student > Master 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Researcher 23 8%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 64 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 131 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 12%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 78 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#972,344
of 32,731,004 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#1,267
of 10,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,922
of 431,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#15
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,731,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.