↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Self-Harm and Suicide Websites: A Qualitative Interview Study of Young Adult Website Users

Overview of attention for article published in Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Understanding Self-Harm and Suicide Websites: A Qualitative Interview Study of Young Adult Website Users
Published in
Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, May 2008
DOI 10.1027/0227-5910.29.3.118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren Baker, Sarah Fortune

Abstract

Self-harm and suicide websites have been heavily criticized both in the literature and the wider media, despite the fact that very little is known about them. To date, no study has interviewed users of these sites about them. This qualitative study aims to explore the accounts of young adults who engage in self-harming and suicidal behaviors and use websites dedicated to these issues, in order to develop a broader understanding of these websites and to identify potential implications for future research. In-depth interviews were conducted via e-mail with 10 participants, who were recruited directly from self-harm and suicide websites. Using discourse analysis, we identified three main ways in which participants wrote about the sites. They constructed them as sources of empathy and understanding, as communities, and as a way of coping with social and psychological distress. These discourses gave users access to important, socially valued identities, such as being understood, belonging to a community and coping with their problems. If health professionals and researchers hope to understand people who use self-harm and suicide websites, and engage them in their services, they must take a more balanced view and not focus solely on the possible risks associated with using such sites.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 139 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Social Sciences 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 39 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,478,455
of 29,631,763 outputs
Outputs from Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention
#54
of 817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,152
of 102,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,631,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them