↓ Skip to main content

Introduction and uptake of electronic growth charts in southern New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Introduction and uptake of electronic growth charts in southern New Zealand
Published in
Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, September 2018
DOI 10.1111/jpc.14217
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The introduction of an electronic system for recording and displaying growth measurements replaces multiple paper growth charts and theoretically improves the availability and consistency of information to support clinical decision-making. Introducing this in a single New Zealand District Health Board provided the opportunity to evaluate usage in hospital settings and determine the uptake of growth recording in a defined population. All records between 2010 and 2015 in the Southern District Health Board (SDHB) anthropometry database were downloaded and examined in a retrospective cohort analysis. Records were extracted after matching to demographic and clinical setting data from the hospital patient management system. Analysis included 30 670 data entry points, representing 8551 children. Data entry increased over time to a maximum of 8407 observations in 2015. By the fifth year of use, up to 67% of available clinical encounters had anthropometry recorded in the outpatient department. Rates were lower in the inpatient setting, where only up to 18.4% had anthropometry recorded. The errors identified were low (0.2% of all data). Weight was the most commonly recorded measurement (98.2% of anthropometry entries, 35.1% of available clinical presentations). Height was available for 82.6% of entries and 29.5% of presentations. A body mass index z-score was available for 81.5% of entries and 29.1% of presentations. A head circumference was available for 50.2% of children <2 years age who had anthropometry recorded. The introduction of an electronic anthropometry database has been successful with increasing rates of use over time, especially in outpatient clinics. Further focus to improve inpatient recording of height and weight is needed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 19 51%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Researcher 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2019.
All research outputs
#28,640,276
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#3,229
of 3,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,918
of 378,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#80
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.