↓ Skip to main content

Emerging targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emerging targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, January 2016
DOI 10.1586/14737140.2016.1126514
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related deaths in United States, accounting for more than one-fourth of the deaths annually. Although comparatively rare and relatively less studied, genetic abnormalities other than EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangements and KRAS mutations account for significant proportion of the driver mutations identified thus far. The targeted agents against BRAF V600E mutation, MET pathway, ROS1 rearrangement, RET rearrangement and HER-2 pathways offer promising therapeutic options. Recruiting patients with these rarer mutations to well-designed, large multicenter trials to further validate the use of targeted agents remains a challenge. The clinical data and ongoing trials with these agents are reviewed in this article.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,778,101
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
#695
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,845
of 393,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.