↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for enhancing psychosocial support of NICU parents through staff education and support

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Perinatology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
409 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recommendations for enhancing psychosocial support of NICU parents through staff education and support
Published in
Journal of Perinatology, November 2015
DOI 10.1038/jp.2015.147
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Providing psychosocial support to parents whose infants are hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can improve parents' functioning as well as their relationships with their babies. Yet, few NICUs offer staff education that teaches optimal methods of communication with parents in distress. Limited staff education in how to best provide psychosocial support to families is one factor that may render those who work in the NICU at risk for burnout, compassion fatigue and secondary traumatic stress syndrome. Staff who develop burnout may have further reduced ability to provide effective support to parents and babies. Recommendations for providing NICU staff with education and support are discussed. The goal is to deliver care that exemplifies the belief that providing psychosocial care and support to the family is equal in importance to providing medical care and developmental support to the baby.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 406 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 17%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Other 34 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 88 22%
Unknown 121 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 114 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 15%
Psychology 56 14%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Arts and Humanities 6 1%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 134 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,233,859
of 28,701,752 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Perinatology
#268
of 3,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,834
of 403,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Perinatology
#14
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,701,752 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.