↓ Skip to main content

Long‐term anoxia and release of ancient, labile carbon upon thaw of Pleistocene permafrost

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long‐term anoxia and release of ancient, labile carbon upon thaw of Pleistocene permafrost
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/2015gl066296
Authors

Stephanie A. Ewing, Jonathan A. O'Donnell, George R. Aiken, Kenna Butler, David Butman, Lisamarie Windham‐Myers, Mikhail Z. Kanevskiy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 30%
Environmental Science 15 22%
Chemistry 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,462,042
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#6,162
of 21,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,815
of 399,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#76
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.