↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) asthma control criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparing Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) asthma control criteria
Published in
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.anai.2018.09.448
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adequate assessment of control is critical to asthma management. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) criteria are commonly used measures of asthma control. This study is to examine the relationships between the ACQ and NEAPP criteria and compare the validity in association with lung function, asthma exacerbation and quality of life. The ACQ and the NAEPP criteria were administered to 373 adolescents with asthma, aged 12-20. The two measures correlated with FEV1, asthma exacerbation (oral corticosteroid [OCS] use, hospitalization and emergency department [ED] use) in the past 12 months, and quality of life. Agreement between the ACQ and NEAPP criteria was moderate (Kappa=0.40 to 0.61). Neither of the two measures was a reliable predictor of FEV1<80% due to high false positives for ACQ (68%) and low sensitivity for NAEPP (49%). The NAEPP identified more cases of uncontrolled asthma (84.6%) than ACQ (64.6%). The ACQ was a significant predictor of recent OSC use, hospitalization, and ED visits (AUC=0.66, 0.66, 0.64, respectively; p<0.001), as was NAEPP (AUC=0.63, 0.66, 0.61, respectively; p<0.001). Both measures significantly associated with quality of life, and the relationships were particularly strong for ACQ (r=-0.87 for symptom subscale; r=-0.76 for activity subscale; and r=-0.78 for emotional function subscale). Neither ACQ nor NAEPP appears to reliably predict lung function, while both measures reasonably associate with acute asthma exacerbation. The ACQ may be the superior measure in gauging the psychosocial impact of asthma control given its particularly strong associations with quality of life.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 31 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 31 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#24,656,863
of 27,396,316 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
#4,616
of 4,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,171
of 352,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
#43
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,396,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.