You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Is the Anthropocene?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2015eo040297 |
| Authors |
Lucy Edwards |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 88% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 88% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,789,973
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#496
of 3,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,232
of 395,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.