↓ Skip to main content

Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
9 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1513967112
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Integrated assessment models of climate and the economy provide estimates of the social cost of carbon and inform climate policy. We create a variant of the Regional Integrated model of Climate and the Economy (RICE)-a regionally disaggregated version of the Dynamic Integrated model of Climate and the Economy (DICE)-in which we introduce a more fine-grained representation of economic inequalities within the model's regions. This allows us to model the common observation that climate change impacts are not evenly distributed within regions and that poorer people are more vulnerable than the rest of the population. Our results suggest that this is important to the social cost of carbon-as significant, potentially, for the optimal carbon price as the debate between Stern and Nordhaus on discounting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 299 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 15%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 4%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 90 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 54 18%
Environmental Science 43 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 6%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 110 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2026.
All research outputs
#570,280
of 34,746,409 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,125
of 119,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,321
of 446,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#162
of 882 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,746,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 882 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.