↓ Skip to main content

European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
67 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
743 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
622 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, December 2015
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208337
Pubmed ID
Authors

L Gossec, J S Smolen, S Ramiro, M de Wit, M Cutolo, M Dougados, P Emery, R Landewé, S Oliver, D Aletaha, N Betteridge, J Braun, G Burmester, J D Cañete, N Damjanov, O FitzGerald, E Haglund, P Helliwell, T K Kvien, R Lories, T Luger, M Maccarone, H Marzo-Ortega, D McGonagle, I B McInnes, I Olivieri, K Pavelka, G Schett, J Sieper, F van den Bosch, D J Veale, J Wollenhaupt, A Zink, D van der Heijde

Abstract

Since the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 2012, new evidence and new therapeutic agents have emerged. The objective was to update these recommendations. A systematic literature review was performed regarding pharmacological treatment in PsA. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and the expert opinion of the 34 Task Force members. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were allocated. The updated recommendations comprise 5 overarching principles and 10 recommendations, covering pharmacological therapies for PsA from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), to conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, whatever their mode of action, taking articular and extra-articular manifestations of PsA into account, but focusing on musculoskeletal involvement. The overarching principles address the need for shared decision-making and treatment objectives. The recommendations address csDMARDs as an initial therapy after failure of NSAIDs and local therapy for active disease, followed, if necessary, by a bDMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD). The first bDMARD would usually be a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. bDMARDs targeting interleukin (IL)12/23 (ustekinumab) or IL-17 pathways (secukinumab) may be used in patients for whom TNF inhibitors are inappropriate and a tsDMARD such as a phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitor (apremilast) if bDMARDs are inappropriate. If the first bDMARD strategy fails, any other bDMARD or tsDMARD may be used. These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of PsA and strategies to reach optimal outcomes in PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 622 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 610 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 97 16%
Other 92 15%
Student > Master 72 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 11%
Student > Postgraduate 41 7%
Other 124 20%
Unknown 126 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 304 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 2%
Other 77 12%
Unknown 149 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#414,462
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#160
of 7,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,651
of 401,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#2
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.