↓ Skip to main content

The Evolution of Tumors in Mice and Humans with Germline p53 Mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Evolution of Tumors in Mice and Humans with Germline p53 Mutations
Published in
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027631
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mice with a homozygous p53 gene deletion develop thymic lymphomas by 9 wk of age. Using the sequence of the rearranged T-cell receptor gene from each clone of cells in the thymus, one can determine the number of independent transformation events. These tumors are oligoclonal, occurring at a frequency of 0.13-0.8 new cancer clones per day. By 20 wk only a few clones are detected, indicating competition among transformed cell clones. DNA sequencing of these tumors demonstrates a point mutation frequency of one per megabase and many genes that are consistently amplified or deleted in independent tumors. The tumors begin with an inherited p53 gene deletion. Next is a PTEN mutation in a stem cell or progenitor cell, before the rearrangement of the T-cell receptor. After that, the T-cell clone selects gene amplifications in cyclin D and cdk-6, and in Ikaros in the Notch pathway. Humans heterozygous for the p53 mutant gene in the germline (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) develop cancers at an early age. The penetrance of heterozygous p53 mutations is ∼93% of individuals developing tumors over their lives. At older ages the remaining 7% of this Li-Fraumeni population actually have a lower risk of developing tumors than the population at large with wild-type p53 genes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
#226
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,818
of 395,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.