Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is characterized by its collaborative efforts between professional researchers and lay community members to design, implement, and iteratively evaluate interventions. This approach creates knowledge and improves practice in ways that reflect the collective wisdom and expertise of all involved stakeholders. It represents a significant departure from conventional "top down" methods that define "collaboration" as professionals working with each other-but not with patients and families. It is our position, however, that these exciting developments are only most visible in adult medicine. We believe that it is important to engage youth in health-related CBPR for three primary reasons which are provided in this article. Examples of youth-engagement in health research are also provided. It is important that we do not leave our youth on the sidelines as we advance health care research. During this critical time in health care, we must endeavor to engage our youth as active stakeholders. As we use methods that bridge our professional expertise with teens' lived experience and wisdom, we can create sustainable interventions that are effective in preventing or mitigating the conditions that weigh most heavily on us all. (PsycINFO Database Record
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2017.
All research outputs
#10,469,193
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family HealthCare
#167
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,994
of 410,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family HealthCare
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
