↓ Skip to main content

Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for menopausal symptoms after risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy (PURSUE study): a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for menopausal symptoms after risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy (PURSUE study): a randomised controlled trial
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, October 2018
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.15471
Pubmed ID
Authors

CMG van Driel, GH de Bock, MJ Schroevers, MJ Mourits

Abstract

To assess the short- and long-term effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on the resulting quality of life, sexual functioning, and sexual distress after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Randomized controlled trial. A specialized family cancer clinic of the university medical center Groningen. 66 women carriers of the BRCA1/2 mutation who developed at least two moderate-to-severe menopausal symptoms after RRSO. Women were randomized to an 8 week MBSR training or care as usual (CAU). Change in the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL), the Female Sexual Function Index, and the Female Sexual Distress Scale administered from baseline at 3, 6, and 12 months. Linear mixed modeling was applied to compare the effect of MBSR with CAU over time. At 3 and 12 months there were statistically significant improvements in the MENQOL for the MBSR group compared with the CAU group (both p = 0.04). At 3 months, the mean MENQOL scores were 3.5 (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3.0-3.9) and 3.8 (95%CI, 3.3-4.2) for the MBSR and CAU groups, respectively; at 12 months, the corresponding values were 3.6 (95%CI, 3.1-4.0) and 3.9 (95%CI, 3.5-4.4). No significant differences were found between the MBSR and CAU groups in the other scores. MBSR was effective at improving quality of life in the short- and long-term for patients with menopausal symptoms after RRSO. However, it was not associated with improvement in sexual functioning or distress. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 10 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 98 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Psychology 28 13%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 102 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,580,768
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#2,141
of 6,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,231
of 363,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#40
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.