↓ Skip to main content

The Potentiation of IFN-γ and Induction of Cytotoxic Proteins by Pegylated IL-10 in Human CD8 T Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
18 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Potentiation of IFN-γ and Induction of Cytotoxic Proteins by Pegylated IL-10 in Human CD8 T Cells
Published in
Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1089/jir.2014.0221
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) exerts both immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory effects. While the immunosuppressive effects are widely known, it has only been recently reported that pegylated recombinant human IL-10 (PEG-rHuIL-10) elicits potent interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and CD8 T-cell-dependent antitumor effects in murine tumor models. In this study, we show that PEG-rHuIL-10 exerts immune inhibitory effects on human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) bulk cultures and stimulatory effects in CD8 T cells within the same culture. Also, in isolated CD8 T cells, PEG-rHuIL-10 potentiates prototypic Tc1 cytokine IFN-γ expression and induces perforin and granzyme B secretion. IFN-γ and granzyme B secretion is dependent on T-cell receptor ligation and is therefore not indiscriminately released by PEG-rHuIL-10 treatment. STAT3, NF-κB, AP1, and MEK inhibition blocks IFN-γ potentiation, while perforin induction is impeded by AP1 inhibition, and granzyme B induction is blocked by both AP1 and MEK inhibition. These results extend previous pegylated IL-10 preclinical findings to human CD8 T cells and implicate a strong degree of translation for pegylated IL-10 use in cancer therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 18 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2026.
All research outputs
#3,364,474
of 29,746,997 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research
#67
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,785
of 285,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,746,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.