↓ Skip to main content

Paramedic academics in Australia and New Zealand: The ‘no man's land’ of professional identity

Overview of attention for article published in Nurse Education in Practice, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Paramedic academics in Australia and New Zealand: The ‘no man's land’ of professional identity
Published in
Nurse Education in Practice, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.08.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Those transitioning from practice to academia can struggle with the perception that they might lose their hard-won and deeply-held professional identity, while grappling with the difficulty of creating an academic identity. This is a common experience for those entering universities with strong clinical identities. Paramedics, as members of an emerging health profession, share these challenges with nursing and allied health professionals. In this study of paramedic academics in Australia and New Zealand, a majority did not consider themselves to still be paramedics on the basis that they were no longer clinically active. Nor did they consider themselves to be academics as most lacked doctoral qualifications and associated scholarly achievements that made them feel worthy of a place in the 'academy'. This lack of a professional identity as either a paramedic or an academic places them in a 'no man's land' of professional identity. Many are unable to effectively fuse their paramedic and academic identities to become comfortable as 'paramedic academics'. For this to change, there needs to be a partnership between the paramedicine discipline and universities to ensure that paramedics entering academia have a recognised and valued career pathway and are better prepared to make the transition to academia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Lecturer 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 32 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 26 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Psychology 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Nurse Education in Practice
#1,309
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,030
of 346,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nurse Education in Practice
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.