↓ Skip to main content

Attenuation of Influenza A Virus Disease Severity by Viral Coinfection in a Mouse Model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Virology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Attenuation of Influenza A Virus Disease Severity by Viral Coinfection in a Mouse Model
Published in
Journal of Virology, November 2018
DOI 10.1128/jvi.00881-18
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Influenza viruses and rhinoviruses are responsible for a large number of acute respiratory viral infections in human populations and are detected as co-pathogens within hosts. Clinical and epidemiological studies suggest that co-infection by rhinovirus and influenza virus may reduce disease severity and that they may also interfere with each other's spread within a host population. To determine how co-infection by these two unrelated respiratory viruses affects pathogenesis, we established a mouse model using a minor serogroup rhinovirus (RV1B) and mouse-adapted influenza A virus (PR8). Infection of mice with RV1B two days before PR8 reduced the severity of infection by a low or medium, but not high, dose of PR8. Disease attenuation was associated with an early inflammatory response in the lungs and enhanced clearance of PR8. However, co-infection by RV1B did not reduce PR8 viral loads early in infection or inhibit replication of PR8 within respiratory epithelia or in vitro Inflammation in co-infected mice remained focal, in comparison to diffuse inflammation and damage in the lungs of mice infected by PR8. The timing of RV1B co-infection was a critical determinant of protection, suggesting that sufficient time is needed to induce this response. Finally, disease attenuation was not unique to RV1B: dose-dependent co-infection by a murine coronavirus (MHV-1) also reduced the severity of PR8 infection. Unlike RV1B, co-infection with MHV-1 reduced early PR8 replication, which was associated with up-regulation of IFN-β expression. This model is critical for understanding the mechanisms responsible for influenza disease attenuation during co-infection by unrelated respiratory viruses.Importance Viral infections in the respiratory tract can cause severe disease and are responsible for a majority of pediatric hospitalizations. Molecular diagnostics have revealed that approximately 20% of these patients are infected by more than one unrelated viral pathogen. To understand how viral co-infection affects disease severity, we inoculated mice with a mild viral pathogen (rhinovirus or murine coronavirus) followed two days later by a virulent viral pathogen (influenza A virus). This model demonstrated that rhinovirus can reduce the severity of influenza A virus, which corresponded with an early but controlled inflammatory response in the lungs and early clearance of influenza A virus. We further determined the dose and timing parameters that were important for effective disease attenuation and showed that influenza disease is also reduced by co-infection with a murine coronavirus. These findings demonstrate that co-infecting viruses can alter immune responses and pathogenesis in the respiratory tract.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 6 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 51 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 20 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Mathematics 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 59 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,033,056
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virology
#447
of 29,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,712
of 384,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virology
#6
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.