↓ Skip to main content

Incidence of Visualization of the Glossopharyngeal Nerve after Pediatric Tonsillectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Incidence of Visualization of the Glossopharyngeal Nerve after Pediatric Tonsillectomy
Published in
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, December 2015
DOI 10.1177/0194599815620782
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The objective was to determine the incidence of exposure of the lingual branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve during tonsillectomy with a retrospective review of surgical findings in 138 children who underwent total tonsillectomy at a tertiary medical center. Age, sex, surgical indication, tonsil size, congenital abnormalities, operative time, and surgical findings indicating the presence or absence of the glossopharyngeal nerve in the tonsillar fossa were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with z test, t test, and Fisher's exact test. Thirty-seven nerves were observed in 28 patients, with preponderance for the left fossa (24 of 37 vs 13 of 37; P = .01). In a comparison of children with and without exposed nerves, there was no statistically significant difference in mean age (6.89 vs 7.08; P = .84), proportion of males (14 of 28 vs 54 of 110; P = 1), or proportion of 3 to 4+ tonsils (20 of 28 vs 73 of 110; P = .66). In approximately 20% of children undergoing tonsillectomy, the lateral pharyngeal musculature incompletely protected the lingual branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve from the tonsil capsule.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#24,641,809
of 27,380,387 outputs
Outputs from Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
#4,016
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,863
of 401,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
#38
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,380,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.