↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A comparison of the antimutagenic potential of green, black and decaffeinated teas: contribution of flavanols to the antimutagenic effect
Published in
Mutagenesis, November 1996
DOI 10.1093/mutage/11.6.597
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The present study was undertaken to compare the antimutagenic activity of aqueous extracts, at the concentrations used for human consumption, from green, black and decaffeinated black tea. Antimutagenic potential was evaluated against three indirect-acting dietary carcinogens, Glu-P-1, benzo(a)pyrene and nitrosopyrrolidine. All three types of tea gave rise to strong and concentration-dependent suppression of the mutagenicity of the three premutagens in the presence of an activation system. No major difference in the antimutagenic potential of the three types of tea could be discerned. Black tea, decaffeinated black tea and, to a lesser extent, green tea also antagonized the mutagenicity of the direct-acting mutagen 9-aminoacridine. All three types of tea inhibited markedly the NADPH-dependent reduction of cytochrome c and the O-dealkylations of ethoxy-, methoxy- and, to a much lesser extent, pentoxy-resorufin. When the microsomal metabolism was terminated, after the metabolic activation of the premutagens, incorporation of the aqueous tea extracts into the activation system caused a concentration-dependent suppression of mutagenic response. No significant difference in the antimutagenic activity of the three types of tea in this system was evident. Bearing in mind the much higher concentration of flavanols in green tea compared with the black teas, it may be concluded either that these compounds are unlikely to be the major tea components responsible for the antimutagenic, and possibly anticarcinogenic, properties of tea or that their fermentation products are similarly active.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2026.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Mutagenesis
#384
of 930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,616
of 26,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mutagenesis
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.