↓ Skip to main content

Robust single-cell DNA methylome profiling with snmC-seq2

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Robust single-cell DNA methylome profiling with snmC-seq2
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06355-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Single-cell DNA methylome profiling has enabled the study of epigenomic heterogeneity in complex tissues and during cellular reprogramming. However, broader applications of the method have been impeded by the modest quality of sequencing libraries. Here we report snmC-seq2, which provides improved read mapping, reduced artifactual reads, enhanced throughput, as well as increased library complexity and coverage uniformity compared to snmC-seq. snmC-seq2 is an efficient strategy suited for large-scale single-cell epigenomic studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Master 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 63 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 16%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Engineering 10 5%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 66 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,505,375
of 33,503,639 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#23,643
of 81,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,453
of 377,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#500
of 1,477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,503,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.