You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of location and configuration on forearm and upper arm hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Vascular Surgery, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alik Farber, Tze-Woei Tan, Bo Hu, Laura M. Dember, Gerald J. Beck, Bradley S. Dixon, John W. Kusek, Harold I. Feldman, Dialysis Access Consortium Study Group, L. Dember, J. Kaufman, M. Hawley, A. Lauer, P. LeSage, R. Nathan, E. Holmberg, G. Braden, M. Ryan, A. Berkowitz, A. Rahman, B. Lucas, R. Santos, B. Reyes, A. Greenberg, M. Berkoben, E. Kovalik, J. Lawson, J. Middleton, S. Schwab, D. Schumm, S. Adams, K. Gitter, T. Cantaffa, A. Quarles, J. Work, S. Rhodes, J. Himmelfarb, J. Whiting, J. Kane, S. Freedman, R. Violette, H. Cyr-Alves, K. Garrison, K. Martin, P. Schmitz, V. Jenkins, J. Cotton, E. Husband, M. Allon, M. Robbin, M. Lockhart, B. Casey, J. Newsome, B. Dixon, B. Franzwa, L. Hunsicker, J. Hoballah, D. Katz, W. Sharp, T. Kresowik, Y. Wu, S. Rayhill, T. Pflederer, K. DuPage, K. Welch, F. Darras, A. Banqero, B. Ketel, A. Wounded Arrow, M. Vazquez, I. Davidson, R. Toto, L. Littmon, C. Ying, T. Lightfoot, H. Quinones, R. Saxena, P. Clagett, J. Valentine, B. Dolmatch, J. Thompson, A. Fenves, G. Pearl, A. Ikizler, P. Egbert, J. McNeil, D. Holmes, W. Freiberger, J. Delmez, D. Windus, D. Coyne, M. Rothstein, S. Shenoy, R. Creaghan, B. Lluka, J. Kusek, C. Meyers, H. Feldman, G. Beck, J. Gassman, T. Greene, B. Hu, S. Bi, A. Liu, M. Radeva, L. Tuason, B. Weiss, N. Levin, A. Besarab, G. Chertow, M. Diener-West, T. Louis, W. McClellan, C. Stehman-Breen |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2025.
All research outputs
#7,469,525
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular Surgery
#2,676
of 9,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,011
of 299,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular Surgery
#15
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.