↓ Skip to main content

Recognition Properties and Self‐assembly of Planar [M(2‐pyridyl‐1,2,3‐triazole)2]2+ Metallo‐ligands

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - An Asian Journal, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recognition Properties and Self‐assembly of Planar [M(2‐pyridyl‐1,2,3‐triazole)2]2+ Metallo‐ligands
Published in
Chemistry - An Asian Journal, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/asia.201801132
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Molecular recognition continues to be an area of keen interest for supramolecular chemists. The investigated [M(L)2 ]2+ metallo-ligands (M=PdII , PtII , L=2-(1-(pyridine-4-methyl)-1 H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)pyridine) form a planar cationic panel with vacant pyridyl binding sites. They interact with planar neutral aromatic guests through π-π and/or metallophilic interactions. In some cases, the metallo-ligands also interacted in the solid state with AgI either through coordination to the pendant pyridyl arms, or through metal-metal interactions, forming coordination polymers. We have therefore developed a system that reliably recognises a planar electron-rich guest in solution and in the solid state, and shows the potential to link the resultant host-guest adducts into extended solid-state structures. The facile synthesis and ready functionalisation of 2-pyridyl-1,2,3-triazole ligands through copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) "click" chemistry should allow for ready tuning of the electronic properties of adducts formed from these systems.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#28,615,159
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - An Asian Journal
#4,487
of 7,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,742
of 382,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - An Asian Journal
#84
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.