↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Daily Costs Differ for Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patterns of Daily Costs Differ for Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients
Published in
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, December 2015
DOI 10.1513/annalsats.201506-366bc
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Published studies suggest hospital costs on day one in the intensive care unit (ICU) far exceed those of subsequent days when costs are relatively stable. Yet, no study stratified patients by ICU type. To determine whether daily cost patterns differ by ICU type. We performed a retrospective study of adults admitted to 5 ICUs (2 surgical-SICUquat & CSICUquat, 2 medical-MICUtertiary & MICUquat, 1 general-MSICUcomm) at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, New York during 2013. After excluding costs clearly accrued outside the ICU, daily hospital costs were merged with clinical data. Patterns of daily unadjusted costs were evaluated in each ICU using median regression. Generalized estimating equations with first order autocorrelation were used to identify factors independently associated with daily costs. Unadjusted daily costs were higher on day 1 than on subsequent days only for surgical ICUs-SICUquat (median (interquartile range, IQR): $2636 ($1834,$4282) on day 1 vs. $1840 ($1501,$2332) on day 2, P<0.001) and CSICUquat ($5166 ($3136,$9493) on day 1 vs. $2060 ($1336,$2528) on day 2, P <0.001). In non-surgical ICUs, there was no change (MICUtertiary P =0.12) or a small increase (MSICUcomm P =0.03; MICUquat P =0.01) in cost from days 1 to 2. After multivariate adjustment, there remained a significant decrease in cost from ICU day 1 to 2 in surgical units with statistically similar day 1 and 2 costs for other ICUs. Higher day one costs are not seen in patients admitted to medical/non-surgical ICUs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 21 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 33%
Unspecified 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,875,798
of 26,876,847 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#2,425
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,276
of 399,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#35
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,876,847 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.