↓ Skip to main content

Rift Valley fever virus: A review of diagnosis and vaccination, and implications for emergence in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rift Valley fever virus: A review of diagnosis and vaccination, and implications for emergence in Europe
Published in
Vaccine, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.020
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a mosquito-borne virus, and is the causative agent of Rift Valley fever (RVF), a zoonotic disease characterised by an increased incidence of abortion or foetal malformation in ruminants. Infection in humans can also lead to clinical manifestations that in severe cases cause encephalitis or haemorrhagic fever. The virus is endemic throughout much of the African continent. However, the emergence of RVF in the Middle East, northern Egypt and the Comoros Archipelago has highlighted that the geographical range of RVFV may be increasing, and has led to the concern that an incursion into Europe may occur. At present, there is a limited range of veterinary vaccines available for use in endemic areas, and there is no licensed human vaccine. In this review, the methods available for diagnosis of RVFV infection, the current status of vaccine development and possible implications for RVFV emergence in Europe, are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Algeria 1 <1%
Unknown 297 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Researcher 44 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 100 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 31 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 7%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 113 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2025.
All research outputs
#7,063,613
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#7,519
of 19,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,459
of 300,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#80
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.