↓ Skip to main content

Lived experience practitioners and the medical model: world’s colliding?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mental Health, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lived experience practitioners and the medical model: world’s colliding?
Published in
Journal of Mental Health, December 2015
DOI 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101428
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Australian mental health policy requires that mental health services facilitate meaningful and genuine consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Roles for practitioners who work from their own experience of significant mental health challenges and mental health service use have been implemented in many services to promote participation and the development of more consumer focused services. To enhance understanding of perspectives of individuals working in lived experience roles to more closely understand their experiences and opinions about these roles. A grounded theory study interviews were conducted with 13 lived experience practitioners. The medical model was a core category arising from this work. Participants described the medical model as a prevailing culture within mental health services from their personal and professional experiences. This culture imposed a major limitation on the implementation, effectiveness and development of lived experience roles and themselves as individuals. It was also seen as a major limitation to the progress of Recovery orientated reform. The development of Recovery oriented services requires a strong lived experience practitioner workforce, with appropriate resourcing and support available. The current medical model approach requires critique to facilitate reform and avoid tokenism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 74 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 18%
Psychology 20 12%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 73 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,863,959
of 32,240,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mental Health
#320
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,131
of 429,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mental Health
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,240,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.