↓ Skip to main content

What Goes Up Must Come Down: Integrating Air and Water Quality Monitoring for Nutrients

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Goes Up Must Come Down: Integrating Air and Water Quality Monitoring for Nutrients
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, October 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b03504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen M. Amos, Chelcy F. Miniat, Jason Lynch, Jana Compton, Pamela H. Templer, Lori A. Sprague, Denice Shaw, Doug Burns, Anne Rea, David Whitall, LaToya Myles, David Gay, Mark Nilles, John Walker, Anita K. Rose, Jerad Bales, Jeffrey Deacon, Richard Pouyat

Abstract

Excess nitrogen and phosphorus (i.e., nutrients) environmental loadings continue to affect ecosystem function and human health across the U.S. Our ability to connect atmospheric inputs of nutrients to aquatic endpoints remains limited due to uncoupled air and water quality monitoring. Where connections exist, the information provides insights about source apportionment, trends, risk to sensitive ecosystems, and efficacy of pollution reduction efforts. We examine several issues driving the need for better integrated monitoring, including: coastal eutrophication, urban hotspots of deposition, a shift from oxidized to reduced nitrogen deposition, and the disappearance of pristine lakes. Successful coordination requires consistent data reporting; collocating deposition and water quality monitoring; improving phosphorous deposition measurements; and filling coverage gaps in urban corridors, agricultural areas, undeveloped watersheds, and coastal zones.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 23 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,760,954
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#2,244
of 20,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,936
of 357,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#43
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.