↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical and structural analysis of the pulmonary valve in congenital heart defects: A presentation of two case studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanical and structural analysis of the pulmonary valve in congenital heart defects: A presentation of two case studies
Published in
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.053
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) is the leading cause of pediatric mortality, with many cases affecting the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) or pulmonary valve (PV). Understanding the mechanics of the disease condition can provide insight into development of durable repair techniques and bioengineered replacement devices. This work presents a mechanical and structural analysis of the pulmonary valve of two pediatric cases. Two PV tissues were excised as part of the operative procedure. One PV was obtained from a 9-month-old with Noonan syndrome (Patient 1) and the other from a 6-month-old with tricuspid atresia (Patient 2). The leaflets were subjected to planar biaxial tensile testing and second harmonic generation (SHG) imaging for mechanical and structural evaluation. Patient 1 exhibited a more anisotropic mechanical response than Patient 2, with sample stiffness on par with that of adult PV tissue. Additionally, both samples showed radial and circumferential alignment of collagen fibers on the ventricularis and fibrosa sides of the leaflets, respectively. Collagen fibers on the fibrosa side were also more crimped than on the ventricularis side.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
#1,007
of 1,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,751
of 345,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.