↓ Skip to main content

Bloodstream Infections in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients

Overview of attention for article published in ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bloodstream Infections in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients
Published in
ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, November 2019
DOI 10.1097/mat.0000000000000881
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a common complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and particularly difficult to treat. The presentation is often variable because of altered physiology and augmentation of cardiac output by the device. We studied LVAD recipients at a single institution. Multivariate logistic and Cox (with time-varying parameters) regression were implemented. Of 212 patients, 58% experienced infections. Driveline infection (DLI) affected 31%, with 60% of them having deep-tissue involvement. Sixty-six patients (31%) suffered from 135 BSIs. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was present in 47% of BSIs at presentation and associated with increased mortality. Right heart failure, destination therapy, INTERMACS, morbid obesity, and deep-DLI were independent risk factors for BSI. The BSI was independently associated with mortality. Bridge-to-transplantation (BTT) patients were more likely to receive transplant if they did not have BSIs. Among 104 BTT patients who received heart transplantation, development of BSI was associated with shorter time-to-transplantation. Diagnosis of BSI poses diagnostic and prognostic challenges because of the hemodynamic profile of LVAD patients who may not mount the expected physiologic response to sepsis. Although SIRS criteria lack sensitivity in the LVAD population, SIRS signifies increased risk for death. Deep DLI was the strongest predictor of BSI. Despite the upgrade in listing status of BTT-LVADs with BSIs and shorter time-to-transplantation, BSI remain a major cause of mortality. BSIs are associated with significant mortality and should be regarded as a serious complication, similar to pump thrombosis and stroke.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#23,329,605
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
#2,726
of 3,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,212
of 412,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
#38
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.