↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for 30-day readmission after adrenalectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Surgery, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk factors for 30-day readmission after adrenalectomy
Published in
Surgery, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.041
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Readmissions represent a substantial burden to the health care system. Risk factors for 30-day readmission after adrenalectomy were examined. Patients who underwent adrenalectomy were selected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2015. Among 4,221 patients who underwent adrenalectomy, 216 (5.1%) were readmitted. On multivariate analysis, pre-operative predictive factors associated with readmission were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.8), disseminated cancer (OR 1.6, CI 1.1-2.5), and adrenal injury (OR 10.9, CI 1.8-68.9). Elective procedures had fewer readmissions (OR 0.50, CI 0.33-0.76). and procedures with greater relative value units had greater readmission rates (OR 1.01, CI 1.004-1.02). An open adrenalectomy (21% of patients) had a higher rate of readmission than a laparoscopic approach (8.0% vs 4.3%, OR 1.5, CI 1.1-2.0). Postoperative risk factors affecting readmission included reoperations (OR 3.2, CI 1.3-8.0), wound complications (OR 6.6, CI 3.8-11.7), systemic infection (OR 6.5, CI 3.9-10.7), renal complications (OR 7.1, CI 2.6-19.2), venous thrombotic events (OR 11.3, CI 5.6-22.6), and discharge to home (OR 0.40, CI 0.22-0.73). Encouraging the appropriate use of laparoscopic adrenalectomy, preventing venous thrombotic events and surgical infections, and improving early post-operative follow-up in high-risk patients may decrease readmissions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#19,663,923
of 28,494,563 outputs
Outputs from Surgery
#6,301
of 8,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,362
of 346,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery
#98
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,494,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.